- A major US crypto regulation bill has stalled after banks rejected a White House compromise.
- Banks fear stablecoins could pull billions in deposits from traditional accounts.
- Crypto companies say rewards are essential for attracting users.
- The bill faces a tight deadline before the US midterm elections.
Efforts to pass a major US cryptocurrency regulation bill have hit another hurdle after banks rejected a compromise proposal backed by the White House. The latest disagreement has cast fresh doubt on whether the long awaited legislation will move forward this year.
The proposed law, widely referred to as the Clarity Act, is designed to bring clearer rules to the crypto industry, which has long operated in a regulatory gray area. Supporters say the bill could help accelerate adoption and give companies greater certainty about how digital assets are regulated.
However, tensions between traditional banks and crypto companies have once again stalled negotiations. The dispute now centers on whether crypto firms should be allowed to offer reward based products tied to stablecoins and other digital assets.
President Donald Trump, who has strongly supported crypto reform during his second term, publicly criticized banks for opposing the compromise, accusing them of attempting to derail the administration’s crypto agenda.
Banks warn stablecoins could drain deposits
At the center of the dispute is a concern from banks that crypto platforms could attract customer funds away from traditional banking institutions.
Financial institutions argue that allowing stablecoin issuers and crypto companies to offer yield or rewards could encourage users to move their savings out of bank accounts and into digital asset platforms. That shift could reduce the deposits banks rely on to support lending.
Industry estimates suggest the impact could be significant. Analysts have projected that stablecoins alone could divert hundreds of billions of dollars from US banks over the next few years if the market continues to grow rapidly.
Banks say these risks could threaten financial stability and economic growth if lawmakers fail to carefully design the rules. As a result, they have pushed for stricter limits on how crypto companies can offer incentives or rewards.
Crypto firms say limits would harm competition
Crypto companies see the issue very differently. Major firms argue that offering rewards and incentives is essential for attracting users and building competitive platforms.
Industry leaders say preventing crypto companies from offering such features would place them at a disadvantage compared to traditional financial institutions that already offer interest or benefits on deposits.
Executives from leading crypto firms and industry groups have been involved in discussions with policymakers and banking representatives in an attempt to find a compromise.
The White House recently stepped in to broker a middle ground between the two sides. The proposal would allow certain types of rewards tied to transactions such as peer to peer payments, while preventing rewards on idle stablecoin holdings.
Crypto companies have largely signaled that they could support this compromise. However, banks remain unconvinced and argue that even limited rewards could still trigger large shifts in deposits away from traditional accounts.
Political pressure grows as midterm elections approach
The legislative timeline is also working against the bill. Lawmakers face a shrinking window to finalize the legislation before the US midterm election season begins later this year.
If the bill is not passed by midsummer, analysts believe it may be pushed off the legislative agenda as Congress turns its attention to campaigning.
Political divisions within the Senate add another layer of uncertainty. For the bill to pass, it needs support from several Democratic lawmakers, some of whom have raised concerns about ethics and financial oversight.
Some Democrats want stricter provisions that would prevent elected officials from profiting from cryptocurrency ventures. Others are calling for stronger anti-money laundering rules within the legislation.
These disagreements must be resolved before the bill can move forward. Even then, lawmakers will need to reconcile different versions of the bill written by separate Senate committees.
Complicating matters further is the crowded legislative schedule in Washington. Lawmakers must also prioritize other policy areas, including housing reforms and national security issues.
Rising geopolitical tensions and ongoing international conflicts are also absorbing significant attention from policymakers, making it harder to dedicate time to complex financial legislation.
The crypto industry’s push for regulatory clarity
For the cryptocurrency sector, passing comprehensive regulation has become a top priority. Industry leaders have spent years lobbying for clearer rules that define how digital assets should be classified and regulated.
Companies argue that uncertainty over whether tokens fall under securities law, commodities regulation, or other financial frameworks has slowed innovation and investment in the United States.
The industry also invested heavily in political campaigns ahead of the last election cycle, supporting candidates seen as favorable to crypto friendly policies.
Advocates warn that failing to pass the legislation this year could delay meaningful regulatory reform for years, particularly if the political balance of Congress changes after the upcoming elections.
For now, negotiators continue to search for a workable agreement that satisfies both banks and crypto companies. But with the political calendar tightening and disagreements unresolved, the future of the crypto regulation bill remains uncertain.
Follow TechBSB For More Updates
